Some interesting privacy and technology readings
January 30, 2009 Filed in: Privacy
The January 2009 issue of Wired had I Am Here: One Man's Experiment
With the Location-Aware Lifestyle, a
wonderful article on both the exciting
possibilities and the sobering unintended
consequences of ubiquitous GPS. A must-read if
you don’t use these technologies yourself.
What Was Privacy?, in the October 2008 Harvard Business Review, is a stellar piece on privacy. There’s a business slant that makes it even more interesting.
Finally, the cover essay of the January 2009 Esquire, What the Hell Just Happened? A Look Back at the Last Eight Years, has a canny first paragraph that applies nicely in a privacy context:
There is this thing we do. It's a small thing. It's a formality, at worst an annoyance. We do it every time we buy a computer or a device requiring software. We do it when we download software online, and then when the software is updated. We do it in order to buy things. We do it in order to sell or share things. We do it in order to find dates and to expand the universe of friendship. We do it in order to express ourselves in writing or film or song, and then we do it in order to read and to watch and to listen. It is the act of everyone, and it involves everything. And what it is — what we do — is this: We agree. We agree to the terms and conditions of service. We agree to use a product that is not our own — that is licensed, not sold. We agree to entrust and, if our trust is broken, to forgive. In what might be called the opposite of the moment of truth, we are given a choice, to accept or to decline, and we accept. We are in the habit of assent, and so the world we live in is the world we have helped bring into being. It is the power of our powerlessness. Our virtual signatures are everywhere, and yet we lost track of them long ago and have no idea what liabilities they might entail — what we've given up and to whom we've given it.
What Was Privacy?, in the October 2008 Harvard Business Review, is a stellar piece on privacy. There’s a business slant that makes it even more interesting.
Finally, the cover essay of the January 2009 Esquire, What the Hell Just Happened? A Look Back at the Last Eight Years, has a canny first paragraph that applies nicely in a privacy context:
There is this thing we do. It's a small thing. It's a formality, at worst an annoyance. We do it every time we buy a computer or a device requiring software. We do it when we download software online, and then when the software is updated. We do it in order to buy things. We do it in order to sell or share things. We do it in order to find dates and to expand the universe of friendship. We do it in order to express ourselves in writing or film or song, and then we do it in order to read and to watch and to listen. It is the act of everyone, and it involves everything. And what it is — what we do — is this: We agree. We agree to the terms and conditions of service. We agree to use a product that is not our own — that is licensed, not sold. We agree to entrust and, if our trust is broken, to forgive. In what might be called the opposite of the moment of truth, we are given a choice, to accept or to decline, and we accept. We are in the habit of assent, and so the world we live in is the world we have helped bring into being. It is the power of our powerlessness. Our virtual signatures are everywhere, and yet we lost track of them long ago and have no idea what liabilities they might entail — what we've given up and to whom we've given it.